The Supreme Court ruled against nationwide injunctions, restricting lower federal courts' power to issue remedies only to the plaintiffs involved in specific cases. Justice Amy Coney Barrett's opinion in Trump v. CASA emphasized that individual plaintiffs would receive complete relief without the need for broader injunctions. This ruling has significant implications for future challenges of government actions, as it requires all affected parties to file individual lawsuits, effectively allowing the government to continue potential rights violations without immediate checks.
The Supreme Court's decision limits federal courts to relief applicable only to the plaintiffs before them, undermining the power of nationwide injunctions.
Justice Amy Coney Barrett asserts that plaintiffs' individual relief does not necessitate a broader injunction, effectively allowing government rights violations.
Collection
[
|
...
]