The Future of Tech Regulation Is Both Stupid and Scary
Briefly

Missouri attorney general Andrew Bailey has demanded explanations from big tech companies regarding their responses to a question about antisemitism among U.S. presidents. The inquiry stemmed from responses given by AI chatbots, where significant inconsistencies were noted, particularly in how President Donald Trump was rated. The demand for transparency reflects concerns about the reliability of AI in assessing factual matters. Bailey's actions echo broader concerns about Big Tech's role in shaping societal narratives, suggesting a potential push for censorship disguised as a free speech initiative.
Missouri attorney general Andrew Bailey has sent letters to big tech companies accusing them of possible fraud and false advertising, demanding they explain their responses to controversial topics.
Three out of six AI chatbots rated President Donald Trump last regarding antisemitism, raising questions about the objectivity and accuracy of AI's assessments on serious societal issues.
Bailey's letter, while demanding accountability from tech companies, reflects a concerning push for partisan censorship under the guise of advocating for free speech.
Big Tech's failure to deliver objective truth, instead opting to act as societal oracles, has been publicly demonstrated by their treatment of contentious and critical historical political judgments.
Read at Intelligencer
[
|
]