The article challenges outdated stereotypes of UX writers as lone creatives engaged in poetic endeavors. It argues that true UX writing is grounded in clarity and user needs, rather than subjective ideas of 'beauty' or 'friendliness.' Vague requests can lead to confusion, making content less accessible. A strong emphasis is placed on the importance of using evidence and data to create meaningful content that resonates with the audience, emphasizing that good UX writing is about communicate effectively and understandably to all users, aligning with their expectations and context.
Well, let me tell you - there's nothing poetic, romantic, or beautiful about writing for interfaces. No, not even beautiful. That word, like so many others, means different things to different people.
These vague, subjective requests can easily lead to writing that isn't for 'anyone, anywhere' - but just for one person's version of what sounds nice.
If UI text is not understandable by anyone, anywhere, it's not good.
In fact, UX writing is about using evidence and data to produce content your audience needs, at the time they need it, on a channel they are on, and in a way they expect.
Collection
[
|
...
]