In the 1950s, philosopher Mary Midgley highlighted the near-exclusively unmarried male figures in philosophy, confronting the norms of her time. Her BBC script 'Rings and Books' faced opposition for introducing what was seen as trivial—suggesting that personal lives matter in the intellectual sphere. Although dismissed then, Midgley's reflections anticipated feminist perspectives of the 2000s. Her early ties with notable female philosophers demonstrated the importance of gender and personal relationships in philosophical discourse, advocating a more inclusive approach to understanding ideas and scholars alike.
Midgley’s daring to discuss the marital status of philosophers was met with hostility, illustrating how personal aspects can be dismissed as irrelevant in academia.
The rejection of 'Rings and Books' highlights the prevailing notion in philosophy that personal circumstances are untouchable in the realm of intellectual discussion.
Despite initial disapproval, Midgley’s insights foreshadowed later feminist discourse that explored how personal contexts influence philosophical thought.
Midgley’s early relationships with women philosophers shaped her perspective, emphasizing the communal and interactive nature of philosophical inquiry.
Collection
[
|
...
]