#executive-power

#executive-power

Trump's tariff increases signify a major shift in U.S. economic policy and raise concerns about executive overreach and investor confidence.

The Senate passed a resolution blocking Trump's tariffs on Canadian goods, reflecting bipartisan concern over the use of emergency powers.

Trump's tariff plan faces Congressional opposition, but proposed bills to limit his power are unlikely to pass.

Trump's tariff imposition is a misuse of emergency powers that strays from actual national security threats.

Trump's legal strategy is based on provoking lawsuits that may affirm a vision of expansive presidential authority.

The Supreme Court halted the Trump administration's deportation of Venezuelans, enabling them to challenge their cases legally.

The court denied the government's motion for an emergency stay, emphasizing the importance of due process and the need to respect constitutional rights.

Federal judge orders daily updates on the deportation of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, highlighting judicial concerns over executive power and immigration enforcement.

The U.S. faces a constitutional crisis challenging the foundation of habeas corpus and the rule of law.

The Constitution's separation of powers is crucial to prevent any individual from holding absolute authority, as demonstrated by recent executive tariff decisions.

Paul Revere's historic ride symbolizes the ongoing struggle for democracy against threats to constitutional rights.

The current administration is seen as undermining constitutional principles and accumulating power unchecked.

American citizenship and rights are now seen as provisional, impacted by current leadership actions.

Musk's oversight of DOGE is claimed unconstitutional, lacking Congressional approval.

Trump's second presidency emphasizes executive power, often ignoring Congress and the courts.

Owner-operated businesses are challenging Trump's tariffs, claiming they are unconstitutional and exceed executive power.

Support from states, society, or the military is crucial for courts to effectively limit noncompliant executive power.

The EFF supports Perkins Coie's opposition to Trump's executive order as it threatens First Amendment rights and the integrity of legal representation.

Vice-President JD Vance's comments signify a troubling departure from constitutional norms regarding checks and balances.

House Republicans, including Tom Cole, support Trump's federal oversight despite concerns about executive power.