#federal-policies

#federal-policies

Boston University students protested to demand the university designation as a "sanctuary campus" amid concerns of federal immigration enforcement.

State officials aim to use all resources to protect citizens against federal immigration policies.

Massachusetts will not assist in deportation efforts, affirming local autonomy.

Boston and other cities have established strong sanctuary city policies.

The removal of an LGBTQ history exhibit highlights the tension and uncertainty within federal agencies following recent executive orders.

President Trump has quickly pushed through significant changes in governance, continuing his America First agenda with tariffs and proposed relocations of Palestinians.

Federal agencies are removing diversity resources in response to Trump's executive order, raising concerns about workforce inclusivity.

The VA will cease medical treatment for gender dysphoria for veterans, aligning with recent federal policies.

The U.S. government under Trump is set to impose restrictive policies on transgender rights, igniting advocacy and resistance efforts from the community.

Federal executive orders have disrupted university operations and funding, affecting graduate students' research and financial support.

Tribal colleges faced significant policy challenges under the Trump administration, igniting a strong response from educators and students.

OPM's new guidance could dramatically change remote work policies at the USPTO, affecting operations.

Agencies must take immediate action in response to the return-to-office mandate.

Trump signed an executive order to terminate federal DEI programs, promoting a merit-based system instead.

Trump suggests eliminating FEMA, advocating for state-led disaster recovery.

Conflicting federal policies hinder effective flood insurance risk assessment and community awareness regarding upstream dam dangers.

Federal security measures obstruct vital information sharing, risking lives and increasing insurance costs for residents in flood-prone areas.

Conflicting federal policies hinder flood risk awareness, leading to potential higher costs and increased danger for residents in flood-prone areas.

Conflicting federal policies may increase flood insurance costs and endanger lives by limiting access to critical dam safety information.