Judge Releases Redacted Trove of Evidence in Trump Election Case
Judge Chutkan ordered the release of evidence related to Trump's alleged election interference, rejecting claims of potential electoral impact on voters.
Family Court blunder gives 79 divorced couples a second chance at love
A judge has allowed 80 separated couples to reconsider their divorces due to an administrative error.
New York appeals court rejects Donald Trump's third request to delay Monday's hush money trial
Trump's legal team challenges trial judge's decisions and seeks postponement based on strategic reasons.
Trump's bid to delay hush money trial again rejected by New York appeals court
The New York appeals court denied Trump's request to delay his upcoming hush money trial.
The rejection heightens the probability that the trial will commence on April 15, marking a legal setback for Trump.
Judge Releases Redacted Trove of Evidence in Trump Election Case
Judge Chutkan ordered the release of evidence related to Trump's alleged election interference, rejecting claims of potential electoral impact on voters.
Family Court blunder gives 79 divorced couples a second chance at love
A judge has allowed 80 separated couples to reconsider their divorces due to an administrative error.
New York appeals court rejects Donald Trump's third request to delay Monday's hush money trial
There's No Copyright Exception to First Amendment Protections for Anonymous Speech
The First Amendment protects anonymous discussions regarding illegal activities, including copyright infringement, and courts have repeatedly denied attempts to unmask such speakers.
Chinese businessman with ties to Prince Andrew banned from UK over security fears
The investigation highlights national security concerns regarding foreign influence in UK politics via close ties with influential figures.
Wisconsin Judge Strikes Down Limits on Public Sector Unions
The Wisconsin judge's ruling against Act 10 temporarily benefits labor unions, but an appeal is anticipated from the Republican majority.
Two California men deemed sexually violent predators ordered to be conditionally released as transients
San Diego judges ordered conditional release of sexually violent predators despite lack of permanent housing, emphasizing the ongoing challenges in managing SVP releases.
What a Georgia Judge's Decision to Strike Down Six-Week Abortion Ban Means
A Georgia judge's ruling against the six-week abortion ban highlights increasing judicial support for reproductive rights and may indicate broader changes nationwide.
A Writer Sees Leniency in the Supreme Court's Approach to Public Corruption
The Supreme Court's recent rulings suggest a leniency towards politicians involved in public corruption, emphasizing a narrow interpretation of federal law.
What a Georgia Judge's Decision to Strike Down Six-Week Abortion Ban Means
A Georgia judge's ruling against the six-week abortion ban highlights increasing judicial support for reproductive rights and may indicate broader changes nationwide.
A Writer Sees Leniency in the Supreme Court's Approach to Public Corruption
The Supreme Court's recent rulings suggest a leniency towards politicians involved in public corruption, emphasizing a narrow interpretation of federal law.
Parole board halts early release of serial rapist, heir to cosmetics fortune
California Board of Parole Hearings reversed the early release decision for serial rapist Andrew Stuart Luster due to errors in the initial evaluation.
Terrorist who plotted to kill hundreds of Londoners in Tube bombing is 'released' from prison
Manfo Asiedu was deported to Ghana after serving 16 years for his role in the failed 2005 London bomb plot, sparking public outrage.
The Supreme Court Didn't Crush Abortion Rights for Once
Fears of conservative Supreme Court restricting reproductive rights put to rest temporarily by unanimous decision rejecting bid to restrict abortion medication.
Morning Docket: 08.15.24
The Roberts Court threatens established rights and regulations, significantly impacting policy on abortion and environmental protections.
Jack Smith Can Still Hurt Donald Trump
The Supreme Court has granted unprecedented criminal immunity to presidents for official acts, limiting judicial inquiry into presidential motives.
The Powell Memo Helped Create Project 2025
Lewis Powell was perceived as a moderate Supreme Court Justice, but his moderation did not extend to economic matters impacting big business.
French: What happened to the originalism of the Supreme Court originalists?
The Supreme Court's recent decisions on presidential immunity are difficult to reconcile with the constitutional text, leading to confusion and questions about potential biases or motivations.
The Supreme Court Didn't Crush Abortion Rights for Once
Fears of conservative Supreme Court restricting reproductive rights put to rest temporarily by unanimous decision rejecting bid to restrict abortion medication.
Morning Docket: 08.15.24
The Roberts Court threatens established rights and regulations, significantly impacting policy on abortion and environmental protections.
Jack Smith Can Still Hurt Donald Trump
The Supreme Court has granted unprecedented criminal immunity to presidents for official acts, limiting judicial inquiry into presidential motives.
The Powell Memo Helped Create Project 2025
Lewis Powell was perceived as a moderate Supreme Court Justice, but his moderation did not extend to economic matters impacting big business.
French: What happened to the originalism of the Supreme Court originalists?
The Supreme Court's recent decisions on presidential immunity are difficult to reconcile with the constitutional text, leading to confusion and questions about potential biases or motivations.