Thomson Reuters has seen a trial against ROSS Intelligence postponed as the court is facilitating an interlocutory appeal concerning copyright infringement with AI applications. Judge Stephanos Bibas issued an order to postpone the trial, allowing ROSS to challenge key rulings from the February 11 decision that partly ruled in favor of Thomson Reuters. The appeal raises essential questions about the originality of Westlaw's headnotes and the applicability of fair use, marking a significant moment that could influence future legal frameworks around artificial intelligence.
The postponement of the trial allows ROSS to file an interlocutory appeal, focusing on crucial questions about copyright originality and fair use in AI applications.
This case could significantly impact the legal precedents surrounding AI technology and fair use, illustrating the complexities inherent in how AI interacts with existing copyright laws.
Collection
[
|
...
]