Judge Stephen McGlynn opens his opinion with analogies comparing gun regulation to safety measures, highlighting a flawed understanding of their purpose in protecting lives. He proclaims that while precautions exist, they shouldn't justify the proliferation of dangerous weapons, as lifeboats are not intended for attack, likening it to using airbags to harm others.
The article critiques Republican judges for dismissing sensible gun regulations, suggesting their rulings are based on a twisted interpretation of the Second Amendment that allows near-total freedom in weapon ownership, overlooking the serious dangers posed by such liberal interpretations.
Collection
[
|
...
]