The U.S. Department of Justice's federal attorneys unintentionally uploaded a confidential memo highlighting the frailty of Secretary Sean Duffy's defense against the MTA's congestion pricing lawsuit. The memo suggests that Duffy's legal grounds are problematic, particularly his claims about 'cordon pricing' and the focus on revenue generation. The memo provides insight that the case could likely be challenging, indicating a potential loss for Duffy. It also reinforces that Congress acknowledges congestion pricing as a viable solution, indicating solid legislative support for such measures.
Duffy's case appears weak, as federal attorneys discuss significant risks in his claims against congestion pricing, outlining fundamental flaws in his legal reasoning.
In the memo, U.S. attorneys argue Duffyâs assertions about the legality of congestion pricing do not hold water, citing a lack of viable grounds for his defense.
Collection
[
|
...
]