The article highlights Chief Justice John Roberts' experience at the recent State of the Union, emphasizing the pretense of judicial impartiality among conservative justices. It criticizes the Supreme Court's actions in Trump v. United States, suggesting a troubling alignment with partisan interests rather than honest jurisprudence. The writing showcases the absurdity of attempts to project neutrality while engaging in politically charged rulings, ultimately depicting a legal system compromised by the influence of partisan politics, especially regarding the relationship between the Court and the former President's legal troubles.
Roberts showed up at the State of the Union last night expecting to take in another evening of sitting stonefaced while pretending it's not weird that the judicial branch attends the president's annual report to Congress.
In Trump v. United States - ending Trump's federal criminal cases and inventing a new double-whammy to shield presidents from state cases - the Chief took great pains to characterize the ruling as entirely normal.
Collection
[
|
...
]