#etf-performance-comparison

#etf-performance-comparison

At 7:46 a.m. Monday, Doornbos had posted on X that Iranian officials were still considering a U.S. proposal to end the war, 'centering around uranium enrichment.'

"Effective immediately, the United States Navy, the Finest in the World, will begin the process of BLOCKADING any and all Ships trying to enter, or leave, the Strait of Hormuz," Trump said in a post on his social media platform, Truth Social, as highlighted by CNBC.

Berkshire Hathaway disclosed ownership of 5,065,744 shares of the New York Times, valued at approximately $351.7 million, marking its return to media investing after exiting its newspaper portfolio in 2020.

Net investment income per share has not covered the quarterly distribution for at least four consecutive quarters. Q1 2026 NII came in at $0.27 per share against a declared distribution of $0.3075.

AMZW is designed to provide weekly distributions and calendar week returns equal to 1.2 times the calendar week total return of Amazon common shares, amplifying both upside and risk.

While most active ETFs fail to keep up with indices, that's not true about every actively managed fund. It turns out there are a few active ETFs that have outperformed the S&P 500 in recent years. Adding these picks to your portfolio can provide additional diversification and possibly boost your returns.

Instead of trying to predict whiplashing oil prices, consider investing in energy ETFs like the Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF and First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure. These ETFs provide exposure to sectors such as pipelines and shipping, independent of oil price fluctuations.

The S&P 500's performance in 2025 marked yet another blockbuster year after performing well in both 2023 and 2024. Many analysts thought that double-digit gains for a third straight year would be too unlikely, but the market ended up proving them wrong. 2026 is off to a great start for the S&P as well, though a correction is certainly overdue at this stage. But can the market prove bears wrong yet again?

If you're used to bringing home an average salary, you can expect Social Security to replace about 40% of it in retirement - assuming that benefits aren't cut broadly, of course. But in that case, living on Social Security alone would mean taking about a 60% pay cut. And while you may very well see your spending decrease in retirement, it may not decrease drastically enough for Social Security alone to cut it.