#major-questions-doctrine

[ follow ]
fromThe Atlantic
3 days ago

The Gorsuch Tariffs Concurrence Is a Warning

By a 6-3 vote in the landmark case Youngstown Steel & Tube Co. v. Sawyer (1953), the Supreme Court disagreed. The majority opinion, written by Justice Hugo Black, held that Congress had refused to pass a statute that authorized the president to seize this kind of private property and, therefore, the president lacked legal authority for his actions.
US politics
#supreme-court
#ieepa
US politics
fromwww.housingwire.com
1 month ago

FNF disputes magistrate judge's support for FinCEN's AML rule

FNF sued FinCEN and the Treasury asserting a reporting rule for all-cash home purchases is arbitrary, exceeds authority, treats lawful sales as suspicious, and imposes massive costs.
from99% Invisible
5 months ago

Constitution Breakdown #2: Rep. Sharice Davids - 99% Invisible

Rep. Davids, raised by a single mother who served 20 years in the Army, worked her way from Johnson County Community College to a law degree at Cornell as a first-generation college student. She built a career in economic and community development, including serving as a White House Fellow under President Obama, before becoming one of the first two Native American women in Congress. Since then, she has focused on putting Kansans first, fighting special interests, and expanding access to affordable health care.
US politics
US politics
fromwww.nytimes.com
10 months ago

Opinion | This Conservative Legal Doctrine Is a Problem for Trump

The major questions doctrine is now being used against President Trump's claims of presidential power.
This legal doctrine requires congressional authorization for significant governmental actions.
[ Load more ]