Motivational interviewing (MI) addresses the common human experience of ambivalence, which creates internal conflict when faced with decisions about change. It draws upon the 'approach/avoidance' model, illustrating the struggle between opposing desires, and the 'stages of change' model, which emphasizes the need for pros to outweigh cons for progress. Many resort to avoidant strategies to mitigate discomfort, but these often result in cyclical indecision. New research suggests that we can harness ambivalence as a tool for growth, using MI techniques to foster deeper understanding and movement toward positive change.
Motivational Interviewing (MI) empowers individuals to navigate ambivalence, highlighting that while conflict is common, it also fuels the potential for growth and change.
The 'approach/avoidance' model reveals how conflicting desires create tension, while the 'stages of change' model illustrates our struggle in balancing the pros and cons of making a choice.
Relying on quick, avoidant strategies to deal with ambivalence only perpetuates a cycle of indecision, underscoring the importance of MI techniques for deeper resolution.
New research indicates that by embracing ambivalence, we can leverage it for personal growth, rather than allowing it to hinder our decision-making processes.
Collection
[
|
...
]