The article discusses how Mark Carney is perceived as a 'reasonable' leader among Canadian voters, particularly highlighted by Mike Myers’ endorsement. In a tumultuous political landscape, this label carries significant weight, as voters prioritize fairness and sound judgment over ideological extremes. The concept of 'reasonable' serves as a mental shortcut for many, aiding in their decision-making process. The article emphasizes society's evolving definitions of what constitutes 'reasonable' based on various factors, suggesting that this quality is especially critical in today's climate of uncertainty and division.
In the mind of a certain type of voter, Carney is thoroughly in the running for most reasonable among the party leaders. That type of voter probably includes the near majority of Canadians who currently view him favourably.
Being able to claim the throne as a reasonable leader right now, in the face of domestic and foreign chaos and threats, is an electoral godsend.
Voters, who tend not to be policy experts or ideologues, put a lot of stock in such things, using them as a mental shortcut to help decide who they should support.
Strictly speaking, definitions of 'reasonable' revolve around being fair, sensible, and moderate and having good sense and sound judgment.
Collection
[
|
...
]